Sunday, February 3, 2013

Top 10 Tech This Week

Click here to view the gallery: Top 10 Tech This Week (02/02/2013)

It was another exciting week in tech, with a major announcement -- the new BlackBerry 10, and a slew of other great stories.

[More from Mashable: Top 10 Tech This Week]

The biggest story of the week was probably the launch of a new flagship phone, the touchscreen-only BlackBerry 10. The product that the company, now named simply BlackBerry, has bet its entire future on. The other two product announcements were not as earth-shattering perhaps, but still significant: Apple confirmed it's launching a 128GB iPad and Nokia launched a Spotify competitor.

It was a great week for science and robotics too. NASA unveiled a bot that will mine the moon, and we had the chance to see how powerful the highest resolution camera -- mounted on a drone -- can be.

[More from Mashable: Top 10 Tech This Week]

Oh, and if you like drones, it's your lucky week -- a small startup announced a mini-drone designed to hover over your shoulder and follow you around all day, taking pictures and videos.

This week, we also have our full comprehensive review of Office 2013 and some updates on the exciting Google Glass project.

Take a look at our Top 10 Tech This Week to see what else happened this week in the world of technology.

Image courtesy of Always Innovating

This story originally published on Mashable here.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/top-10-tech-week-174338010.html

the borgias shroud of turin warren sapp the masters i robot the big c the visitor

Saturday, February 2, 2013

An Evangelical Argument for Permitting Same-Sex Marriage Laws

Recently I mentioned that I was sincerely questioning whether religious conservatives should still favor laws and constitutional amendments against same-sex marriage. ?My reasons were partly practical, partly strategic, and partly theological. ?Let me try to reframe the argument:

1. ?It was once the case that there prevailed in the United States an overwhelming cultural consensus on the meaning of marriage.? The United States inherited its cultural consensus on the meaning of marriage from the Judeo-Christian tradition. ?While some of the stories of the Old Testament show individuals with multiple wives, the image of marriage that emerges from the whole counsel of scripture is strongly monogamous and unequivocally heterosexual. ?When Genesis grounds the marital union of male and female in the created order itself, and when Jesus reaffirms that model, and when countless other scriptures (especially in the epistles) affirm that model as well, it?s 99 percent clear from scripture that marriage should be monogamous and 100% clear that it should be heterosexual. ?This is the model that America received from the classical Christian tradition, and it?s the model I defend to this day.

2. ?The Judeo-Christian model of marriage is not merely pragmatic or moral, but also theological. ?Traditional Christians believe that homosexuality is morally wrong and that same-sex marriage is theologically incoherent. ?Marriage is not merely a contract. ?It?s an institution ordained by God as a shelter for the procreation and protection of children, as a sacrament for his sanctifying grace to the husband and wife, and as an image of (and therefore a teaching tool for) God?s loving union with the church. ?The difference and complementarity of male and female are essential to all three points. ?That this is a THEOLOGY of marriage becomes increasingly apparent when you study other theologies of marriage, such as Neo-Pagan models that are frequently polygynous or polyandrous, or Muslim or various Eastern models that are polygynous, or even emerging secular ideologies of marriage in the west that are merely contractual and include none of the theological content, and certainly not the theology of monogamy, that one finds in the Judeo-Christian model of marriage.

3. ?There is no longer an overwhelming cultural consensus in the United States in favor of the traditional Judeo-Christian model (theology) of marriage. ?If you ask Pew, 49 percent favor allowing same-sex marriage and 40 percent do not. ?An ABC poll from last September presents slightly more favorable figures for the opponents of same-sex marriage, with 37 percent in favor of legal recognition and 55 percent opposed. ?In either case, however, it?s clear the cultural consensus has been lost ? and every indication is that the marriage consensus will dissolve further. ?A recent Gallup poll indicates that 73 percent of younger people favor allowing same-sex marriage.?The New York Times and CBS News have asked the same three-part question for years ? and in November 2004, 21 percent of respondents said that gay couples should be allowed to marry, 32 percent favored civil unions and 44 percent were opposed to any legal recognition. In May of last year, those numbers had changed to 38 percent in support of marriage, 24 percent in favor of civil unions and only 33 percent opposed to legal recognition of same-sex couples. ?That?s a quick change. ?Gay marriage is now legally recognized in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, New York, Maryland, Maine, Washington, and the District of Columbia.

4. ?So the question becomes, in a secular democracy that lacks an overwhelming cultural consensus in favor of the Judeo-Christian model of marriage, can we and should we as Christians insist that our model of marriage and only our model of marriage be legally recognized?? This is where I feel cornered by my own argument. ?I have insisted over against critics that the marriage issue is not just a ?culture war? issue because it?s not a matter of ?cultural? preference but a fundamentally moral and theological matter. ?But if the Judeo-Christian model of marriage is fundamentally moral and theological, then do I have a right in our secular democracy to insist that my moral and theological vision of marriage should be legally enforced while other moral and theological visions should not? ?My quick answer is:

5. ?We have a RIGHT (just like everyone else) to press for laws that we believe are in the best interest of the country, even if those laws are grounded in our religious beliefs ? but whether we SHOULD organize to defend our theological model of marriage legally and oppose other ones is another question.??In my view, it?s perfectly permissible for American laws to enshrine common moral and theological convictions, (A) as long as they do not trample the rights of a minority and (B) as long as there is an overwhelming cultural consensus in favor of those convictions.

To take (A) ? in a sense, everyone has a right to marry. ?The state cannot interfere in someone going into a church to marry. ?But there is no right to have the state recognize your marriage. ?So I do not believe that current laws deny same-sex partners any rights. ?Therefore, I do not accept the argument that there is anything immoral or unconstitutional in promoting the Judeo-Christian model of marriage, just as others will promote other models in the contest of ideas that is democracy.

This is, then, not a moral or constitutional but a prudential question: Should we, in the absence of a cultural consensus in favor of our Judeo-Christian model of marriage, try to get our model of marriage legally enforced and other models excluded? ?I?m not sure that we should. ?When everyone more or less agrees, that?s one thing. ?When a substantial percentage of the country does not, then you have one half of the country (let?s say) forcing the other half to live according to its own moral and theological rules. ?We would be asking the American State to take our side over against other religious or non-religious ways of thinking about marriage. ?I?m not convinced that?s wise.

  • Even though we should continue to affirm our moral view that homosexuality is wrong and our theological view that only heterosexual marriage is truly marriage in the eyes of God, we might acknowledge that we live in an increasingly pluralistic secular democracy where we cannot insist that our moral and theological vision of marriage holds the power of the state and employs that power to defeat and exclude all other models.
  • Even though we might feel that legally recognizing same-sex marriages is not in the best interest of the country, we might also feel that forcing others to live under our moral and theological convictions ? convictions they do not share ? is not in the best interest of our witness to non-believers. ?We cannot always save others from the consequences of their decisions.
  • Even though we might not want, in an ideal world, for same-sex marriage to be legally recognized, we might recognize that the culture is moving that direction, and make a prudential judgment that it would be better to win a legislative compromise that secures our religious freedoms and conscience protections, rather than waiting for the legalization of same-sex marriage by fiat of a Supreme Court judgment that could haunt us for decades to come.

6. ?Finally, however, we can still oppose same-sex marriage legally and theologically, even if we do not prevent it legally. ?Hugh Hewitt had me on his radio program recently, in conversation with Owen Strachan, about the Supreme Court taking up a same-sex marriage case. ?Hugh asked me: ?How would you feel if Justice Kennedy cited your blog post to say that even conservative Christians are dropping their opposition to same sex marriage, and in light of these cultural changes we should legally recognize same-sex marriage?? ?It was a killer question. ?Honestly, I would feel bad. ?I remain a critic of same-sex marriage. ?I oppose it morally and theologically. ?I think its consequences would be negative. ?I?m just not sure I should oppose it legally, because I am reticent to use the law to enforce my theology over others, in light of the aforementioned prudential concerns. ?It?s like premarital sex, or extramarital sex, or divorce without biblical cause, or using God?s name in vain, or committing blasphemy. ?I want to convince the culture that it?s wrong, and harmful, and based on a false understanding of sex, family, and God. ?But that doesn?t mean I should prohibit these things legally. ?So even though I would feel bad, if the witness of the church were better heard, and if we served better to persuade the culture of what we hold to be true and good, then perhaps the outcome would not be too bad. ?But the question itself points out how important it could be to bring some Christian leaders forward to forge a legislative compromise that does not morally condone same-sex marriage, but removes our legal opposition to same-sex marriage in exchange for religious liberty protections. ?Pretty soon, it may be too late for a compromise.

That?s my argument. ?What do you think??

Source: http://www.patheos.com/blogs/philosophicalfragments/2013/02/01/evangelical-argument-permitting-same-sex-marriage-laws/

ashley judd Alois Bell Donna Savattere deer antler spray Jason London coachella frank ocean

Abnormal gut bacteria linked to severe malnutrition

There's more to malnutrition than poor diet. Two complementary studies suggest that microbes have an important role to play in both the onset and treatment of a poorly understood form of malnutrition called kwashiorkor.

Malnutrition, the leading cause of death among children worldwide, remains something of a puzzle. It is unclear, for instance, why some children are especially prone to becoming malnourished when siblings they live with appear to fare better.

Now Jeffrey Gordon at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri, and his colleagues have found that a child's risk of malnutrition may come down to the microbes in his or her guts.

Working in southern Malawi, the team identified sets of identical and non-identical twins in which one child had kwashiorkor ? thought to be caused by a lack of protein - and the other did not, despite the shared genetics and diet. Gordon's team took faecal samples from three sets of twins and transplanted the samples into the guts of mice, which were then fed a typical nutrient-poor Malawian diet.

Mouse weight loss

All of the mice lost some weight. However, some lost significantly more weight, and more quickly, than others. Further investigation showed that these mice had all received a faecal sample from children with kwashiorkor.

The finding strongly hinted that the mice had picked up a kwashiorkor-like condition from the microbes within the faecal implant, so the researchers studied the rodents' gut flora. They found higher than normal levels of bacteria associated with illnesses such as inflammatory bowel disease.

The results suggest pathogenic microbes may heighten the problems of malnutrition in some children, says Jeremy Nicholson at Imperial College London, a member of the study team. "There's a lot of work revolving around obesogenesis ? how given a standard diet one set of bugs might make more calories available than another set," he says. "But the other side of that coin is that maybe particular bugs can restrict calorie availability and exacerbate a poor diet."

Indi Trehan at Washington University, another member of the research team, agrees. "I think it is correct that there are more factors than simple food insecurity at play in terms of malnutrition," he says.

Antibiotic aid

Trehan is lead author on a second new study, which examines how children with kwashiorkor respond when given nutrient-rich therapeutic diets. Trehan's team found that the children were significantly less likely to become malnourished once the dietary treatment had ended if they were given a course of antibiotics along with the diet.

Together, the studies help us understand the role that infections might play in malnutrition, says Trehan. This might point towards a future in which microbial concoctions can be tailored to guard against such infections and treat specific conditions, suggests Nicholson.

Alexander Khoruts at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis has been using faecal transplants to treat resistant Clostridium difficile disease in humans. "It is likely that microbiota are involved in pathogenesis of many other diseases, and it is possible that faecal transplants may be an approach to treat those as well," he says. But because gut bacteria are so complex, he thinks more research will be needed to develop appropriate microbe-based therapies.

Journal references: The Gordon study: Science, doi.org/kct; the Trehan study: The New England Journal of Medicine, doi.org/kc4

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say

Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.

Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article

Subscribe now to comment.

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

Source: http://feeds.newscientist.com/c/749/f/10897/s/28230cc2/l/0L0Snewscientist0N0Carticle0Cdn231270Eabnormal0Egut0Ebacteria0Elinked0Eto0Esevere0Emalnutrition0Bhtml0Dcmpid0FRSS0QNSNS0Q20A120EGLOBAL0Qonline0Enews/story01.htm

godspell media matters hana taylor momsen xbox live update joan rivers gary carter dies

Super Bowl XLVII super stats: chicken wings, avocados, and HDTVs

Super Bowl XLVII will be watched by more people than ever before, and they're buying millions of televisions and preparing lots of food to mark the occasion. Here's a look at the mind-boggling stats for Super Bowl XLVII's TV audience.?

By Schuyler Velasco,?Staff writer / February 2, 2013

Workers drive through an area being set up for fans outside the Mercedes-Benz Superdome on Monday in New Orleans. Super Bowl XLVII is expected to garner the highest-ever TV viewership, and surges in purchases for pizza, chicken wings, and avocados are sure to follow.

Mark Humphrey/AP

Enlarge

Billions of chicken wings, millions of slices of pizza, and nearly 7 million pounds of avocados? Must be Super Bowl time.

Skip to next paragraph

' + google_ads[0].line2 + '
' + google_ads[0].line3 + '

'; } else if (google_ads.length > 1) { ad_unit += ''; } } document.getElementById("ad_unit").innerHTML += ad_unit; google_adnum += google_ads.length; return; } var google_adnum = 0; google_ad_client = "pub-6743622525202572"; google_ad_output = 'js'; google_max_num_ads = '1'; google_feedback = "on"; google_ad_type = "text"; google_adtest = "on"; google_image_size = '230x105'; google_skip = '0'; // -->

It?s no secret: Football is America?s most popular sport, and the NFL its most widely-watched, profitable league. The numbers back that up: The Super Bowl is routinely the most-watched television event of the year, pulling in numbers that make other TV events flush with envy. According to the National Retail Federation (NRF), 179 million people worldwide are expected to watch the Baltimore Ravens take on the San Francisco 49ers in Super Bowl XLVII, up from 172 .5 million last year. The 2012 Oscars, by comparison, netted 39 million viewers. Game 5 of the 2012 NBA Finals? 12.5 million.

And America?s biggest TV-watching ?holiday? is rapidly becoming one of its top consumer-spending holidays as well. The NRF projects that shoppers will spend a combined $12.3 billion on food, gear, and electronics for the Super Bowl this year, up from $11 billion last year.

Why the jump? The NRF suggests that the teams involved could play a role. The 49ers and the Ravens are both hugely popular franchises that haven?t reached the Super Bowl in quite a while: The Ravens last made the trip in 2000; the once-dynastic 49ers in 1994. Some 17 million fans are expected to buy team apparel or accessories, up from 14.8 million last year.?

Super stuffed

But for the most part, we?re spending our money on food. Super Bowl Sunday is the second-biggest food ?holiday? in the US, behind Thanksgiving. It?s a booming weekend for the most popular foods: namely, wings, chips. and pizza.

An estimated 1.2 billion chicken wings will be consumed this Super Bowl Sunday, according to the Washington-based National Chicken Council. That?s down slightly from last year, because chicken wing prices have soared recently in the face of higher demand and soaring costs for feed ? wings currently cost $2.11 per pound on average, up 26 cents from a year ago. There were even frantic rumors circulating last week of a Super Bowl chicken wing shortage, but the council quickly dispelled them.

"The good news for consumers is that restaurants plan well in advance to ensure they have plenty of wings for the big game," National Chicken Council economist Bill Roenikg said in a press statement.

It?s also the busiest day of the year for pizza joints. Dominoes expects to sell 11 million slices this Super Bowl Sunday; Papa John?s sold around 8 million last year. Other big food stats: Football revelers ate 11.2 million pounds of potato chips last year. Another (surprising) contender: avocados. Thanks to guacamole, an estimated 79 million avocados will be eaten during Super Bowl festivities.

TVs

Of course, the Super Bowl is, more than any other, a day for watching television. And to properly mark the occasion, 7.5 million households intend to buy a new TV, according to the NRF. That?s 2 million more than last year, when 5.5. million households bought a new TV for the Super Bowl. Happy high-def football, everyone!

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/csm/~3/rIlIm8WnGoo/Super-Bowl-XLVII-super-stats-chicken-wings-avocados-and-HDTVs

illinois primary 2012 michael bay zsa zsa gabor illinois primary trayvon martin 911 call kiribati vernal equinox

Aztec conquest altered genetics among early Mexico inhabitants, new DNA study shows

Jan. 30, 2013 ? For centuries, the fate of the original Otom? inhabitants of Xaltocan, the capital of a pre-Aztec Mexican city-state, has remained unknown. Researchers have long wondered whether they assimilated with the Aztecs or abandoned the town altogether.

According to new anthropological research from The University of Texas at Austin, Wichita State University and Washington State University, the answers may lie in DNA. Following this line of evidence, the researchers theorize that some original Otomies, possibly elite rulers, may have fled the town. Their exodus may have led to the reorganization of the original residents within Xaltocan, or to the influx of new residents, who may have intermarried with the Otom? population.

Using ancient DNA (aDNA) sampling, Jaime Mata-M?guez, an anthropology graduate student and lead author of the study, tracked the biological comings and goings of the Otom? people following the incorporation of Xaltocan into the Aztec empire. The study, published in American Journal of Physical Anthropology, is the first to provide genetic evidence for the anthropological cold case.

Learning more about changes in the size, composition, and structure of past populations helps anthropologists understand the impact of historical events, including imperial conquest, colonization, and migration, Mata-M?guez says. The case of Xaltocan is extremely valuable because it provides insight into the effects of Aztec imperialism on Mesoamerican populations.

Historical documents suggest that residents fled Xaltocan in 1395 AD, and that the Aztec ruler sent taxpayers to resettle the site in 1435 AD. Yet archaeological evidence indicates some degree of population stability across the imperial transition, deepening the mystery. Recently unearthed human remains from before and after the Aztec conquest at Xaltocan provide the rare opportunity to examine this genetic transition.

As part of the study, Mata-M?guez and his colleagues sampled mitochondrial aDNA from 25 bodies recovered from patios outside excavated houses in Xaltocan. They found that the pre-conquest maternal aDNA did not match those of the post-conquest era. These results are consistent with the idea that the Aztec conquest of Xaltocan had a significant genetic impact on the town.

Mata-M?guez suggests that long-distance trade, population movement and the reorganization of many conquered populations caused by Aztec imperialism could have caused similar genetic shifts in other regions of Mexico as well.

In focusing on mitochondrial DNA, this study only traced the history of maternal genetic lines at Xaltocan. Future aDNA analyses will be needed to clarify the extent and underlying causes of the genetic shift, but this study suggests that Aztec imperialism may have significantly altered at least some Xaltocan households.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by University of Texas at Austin.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Journal Reference:

  1. Jaime Mata-M?guez, Lisa Overholtzer, Enrique Rodr?guez-Alegr?a, Brian M. Kemp, Deborah A. Bolnick. The genetic impact of aztec imperialism: Ancient mitochondrial DNA evidence from Xaltocan, Mexico. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2012; 149 (4): 504 DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22152

Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/most_popular/~3/wgZOTbu1_sc/130131095234.htm

phil mickelson 10 year old gives birth c. difficile carmelo anthony nurse jackie nurse jackie peeps

US Embassy compound in Turkey hit by 'terrorist' blast

NBC's Richard Engel reports witnesses in Turkey are saying a suicide bomber tried to enter the U.S. embassy in Ankara, getting as far as the first x-ray machine before detonating an explosive device. A Turkish guard was reportedly killed in the blast.

By Richard Engel, Aziz Akyavas and Ian Johnston, NBC News

A suicide bomber blew himself up at an entrance to the U.S. Embassy compound in Ankara on Friday, officials said.

Turkish interior ministry officials said the bomber and one other person were killed in the attack?at about 1:15 p.m. local time (6:15 a.m. ET).

The bomber got to the first X-ray machine leading to the visa section, police sources said,?and then detonated the device. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, the sources had said three people were thought to have been killed.

Turkish television footage taken shortly after the attack showed smoke rising from the area and the heavily damaged door, which led to a side street.

Turkish Interior Minister Muammer Guler told reporters that the bomber belonged to an illegal leftist group, Reuters reported. He said the attacker could have been a member of the militant Revolutionary People's Liberation Party-Front or another leftist group.

U.S. Ambassador Francis Ricciardione told reporters that the person who was killed was a guard at the gate was killed, The Associated Press reported.?He added that a Turkish citizen was wounded.

Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan, who was attending a ceremony in Istanbul when the blast happened, said the attack "shows that we need to fight together everywhere in the world against these terrorist elements."?

State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland confirmed in a statement that there had been a "a terrorist blast."?

U.S. officials were "working closely with the Turkish national police to make a full assessment of the damage and the casualties, and to begin an investigation," she added.

Mehmet Ali Ozcan / EPA

Turkish police secure the area after an explosion at an entrance to the U.S. Embassy compound in Ankara Friday.

"We will share more information as it becomes available,? she said.

In an emergency message, the State Department said Americans were ?advised to not visit the Consulates in Istanbul, Adana or the Embassy in Ankara until further notice.?

?The Department of State advises U.S. citizens traveling or residing in Turkey to be alert to the potential for violence, to avoid those areas where disturbances have occurred, and to avoid demonstrations and large gatherings,? the message said.

In Berlin on Friday, Vice President Joe Biden said that he appreciated an "expression of sympathy" over the attack from German Chancellor Angela Merkel, saying it reinforced the "very close counterterrorism cooperation that exists between Germany and the United States."

On Sept. 11 last year, U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed in an attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, prompting concern about security for diplomats.

On Jan. 23, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that?she took responsibility?for not adequately protecting U.S. personnel in Benghazi. Her voice choked with emotion as she remembered the return of "flag-draped caskets" and putting her arms around relatives of those who died.?

The Associated Press noted groups tied to al-Qaida had attacked U.S. and U.K. consulates in Turkey in the past:

Homegrown Islamic militants tied to al-Qaida have carried out suicide bombings in Istanbul, killing 58, in 2003. The targets were the British consulate, a British bank and two synagogues.?

In 2008, an attack blamed on al-Qaida-affiliated militants outside the U.S. Consulate in Istanbul left three assailants and three policemen dead.?

In the November 2003 attack on the British consulate , a suspected Islamic militant rammed an explosive-laden pickup truck into the main gate, killing British Consul-General, Roger Short, and his assistant, Lisa Hallworth.?

The State Department says on its website that 15 people who claimed they were associated with al-Qaida were arrested in July 2011 for gathering explosive materials in preparation for an attack on the U.S. Embassy in Ankara.?

Burhan Ozbilici / AP

Medics carry an injured woman on a stretcher to an ambulance after a suspected suicide bomber detonated an explosive device.

It added that the July plot and other incidents "show a willingness on the part of some terrorist groups to attack identifiably Western targets. The possibility of terrorist attacks, from both transnational and indigenous groups, remains high."

The State Department posting said the PKK Kurdish rebel group was the "most active terrorist organization in Turkey."

It said the PKK had historically targeted Turkish government and military interests, but had recently "threatened increased violent activity in Turkey?s urban areas, and there is credible information suggesting that it intends to continue targeting tourist areas as well."

Earlier this month, about 400 U.S. personnel arrived at Turkey?s Incirlik Air Base to support the deployment of a NATO Patriot missile battery to help defend the country from possible incursions by Syria?s forces during that country?s ongoing civil war.

Reuters, The Associated Press and NBC News Staff Writers?John Newland and Alastair Jamieson contributed to this report.

Related:?

From April 2011: US ally Turkey flirts with Mideast's 'bad boys'

After decades of oppression, Kurds get taste of freedom as Assad's troops flee

Full Turkey coverage from NBCNews.com

Source: http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/01/16804949-us-embassy-compound-in-turkey-hit-by-terrorist-attack?lite

antioch the grey review demi moore 911 call ipo jim rome ufc on fox 2 weigh ins convulsions

Friday, February 1, 2013

NASA Honors Fallen Astronauts in Solemn Ceremony

NASA honored the memories of the seven astronauts lost 10 years ago today (Feb. 1) in the space shuttle Columbia disaster, as well as the agency's other explorers who lost their lives in the pursuit of space exploration.

The solemn ceremony, held at the Kennedy Space Center Visitors Complex in Cape Canaveral, Fla., gathered friends and family members together to remember the lives of the Columbia's final astronaut crew as well as the seven astronauts lost in the Challenger shuttle disaster on Jan. 28, 1986 and three astronauts who perished in the Apollo 1 fire on Jan. 27, 1967.

"We got about the business of picking up the pieces, ensuring that their loss was not in vain," said Robert Cabana, the directory of the Kennedy Space Center. "They were doing their very best to be successful, but we are human and oftentimes when lacking sufficient data we make poor decisions and that results in tragic events like Apollo, Challenger and Columbia. I believe we've learned from them. We've risen above them but we must never forget the lessons learned in the past."

President Barack Obama, who did not attend the ceremony, also released a statement commemorating the sacrifice made by the Columbia astronauts and the crews of Challenger and Apollo 1.

"As we undertake the next generation of discovery, today we pause to remember those who paid the ultimate sacrifice on the journey of exploration," Obama said. "Right now we are working to fulfill their highest aspirations by pursuing a path in space never seen before, one that will eventually put Americans on Mars." [NASA Honors Fallen Astronauts (Photos)]

NASA chief Charles Bolden, a former space shuttle commander, echoed Obama's sentiments.

"In the years after we returned the shuttles to flight, we completed an engineering marvel," Bolden said. "The International Space Station now soars above us, an unparalleled and unique orbiting laboratory that is our foothold to the rest of the solar system. We are in a new era of exploration, where the work and sacrifice of those who have gone before will help us once again launch American astronauts from American soil and send them farther into deep space than we have ever gone."

Bolden attended the Ilan Ramon International Space Conference in Herzliyya, Israel, and was not able to attend the ceremony today.

NASA's astronaut heroes

During the NASA ceremony, speakers remembered the astronauts for their dedication to curiosity and human exploration while standing at a podium in front of the "Space Mirror" ? a memorial wall listing the names of every NASA crew member lost during an accident in the space agency's history.

"We remember the astronauts that took the daring step of accepting the challenge of spaceflight," said Eileen Collins, a retired NASA astronaut who commanded the first shuttle flight after the Columbia tragedy. "For the Columbia crew, it was a fulfillment of their dreams to have an adventure, to live and work in an environment you can't simulate on Earth."

"It's a type of freedom to look down on the planet, to be part of a mission," Collins added. "The Columbia crew was taking baby steps, but big steps begin with baby steps. They were passionate about this mission."

The fallen astronauts were also remembered for their personal achievements. Evelyn Husband-Thompson, the widow of Columbia commander Rick Husband, shared her memories of each of the astronauts on board the space shuttle as it broke apart upon re-entry over East Texas.

"This isn't just historic, but also personal," Husband-Thompson said. "We remember the Columbia crew as friends."

The space agency's ceremony was hopeful at as well. Collins highlighted the successes of the space shuttle program. [Columbia Shuttle Disaster Explained (Infographic)]

"Despites its tragedies, its successes are also part of history. The shuttle was an engineering wonder. The shuttle was a test program, but it achieved its ultimate goal: the International Space Station," Collins said. "We have inspired over 30 years of school children to study math and science."

NASA's space tragedies

The Columbia shuttle disaster occurred during re-entry when the spacecraft broke part due to heat shield damage caused during the orbiter's launch 16 days earlier on Jan. 16, 2003. A piece of external tank foam struck the orbiter's heat shield during liftoff, punching a hole through the orbiter's left wing leading edge.

Columbia's crew, which was returning home after a successful science mission, included commander Rick Husband, pilot Willie McCool, mission specialists Kalpana Chawla, Laurel Clark and David Brown, payload commander Michael Anderson and payload specialist Ilan Ramon, Israel's first astronaut.

A subsequent investigation attributed the loss of Columbia and its crew as much to complacency in NASA's internal culture as to the foam debris strike. The tragedy led to new heat shield repair tools and techniques for subsequent shuttle missions, an ultimately spurred the retirement of the space shuttle program altogether. The last shuttle mission flew in 2011 and today all three of NASA's remaining orbiters are in museums.

NASA's first space mission tragedy, the Apollo 1 fire, occurred on Jan. 27, 1967 when afire broke out in the crew capsule during a ground test, killing astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee.

The first space shuttle disaster would occur 19 years and one day later, on Jan. 28, 1986, when the shuttle Challenger broke apart after liftoff after an O-ring failure in one of the orbiter's twin solid rocket boosters caused the shuttle's external tank to explode. Killed in the explosion were astronauts Francis "Dick" Scobee, Ronald McNair, Mike Smith, Ellison Onizuka, Judy Resnik, Greg Jarvis and Connecticut teacher Christa McAuliffe. It took three years for NASA to resume shuttle missions.

Today, NASA relies on Russia's Soyuz spacecraft to fly Americans to and from low-Earth orbit. However, space agency officials hope to rely on new privately owned spacecraft to taxi astronauts to and from the International Space Station by 2015 or later.

Follow Miriam Kramer on Twitter?@mirikramer?or SPACE.com?@Spacedotcom. We're also on Facebook?&?Google+.?

Copyright 2013 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-honors-fallen-astronauts-solemn-ceremony-184645087.html

Long Island Medium Alfonso Ribeiro cbs sports adam sandler College Football Scoreboard nfl scores nfl scores